i asked gerald about this already but he seemed to think there
wasn't any compelling argument for a separate forum for the
BeagleBoard XM, and he may be right.
i just got one of the prototypes and will finally have time to play
with it starting this weekend, starting of course with my standard
validation and documenting from the beginning. should XM discussion
be kept here, or is there enough of a difference (even subtlely) to
merit a separate forum? i'm good either way, just looking for
opinions.
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> writes:
i asked gerald about this already but he seemed to think there
wasn't any compelling argument for a separate forum for the
BeagleBoard XM, and he may be right.
i just got one of the prototypes and will finally have time to play
with it starting this weekend, starting of course with my standard
validation and documenting from the beginning. should XM discussion
be kept here, or is there enough of a difference (even subtlely) to
merit a separate forum? i'm good either way, just looking for
opinions.
I'm fine talking about it here. After all, the boards are similar
enough to use the same boot loader and kernel.
i asked gerald about this already but he seemed to think there
wasn't any compelling argument for a separate forum for the
BeagleBoard XM, and he may be right.
i just got one of the prototypes and will finally have time to play
with it starting this weekend, starting of course with my standard
validation and documenting from the beginning. should XM discussion
be kept here, or is there enough of a difference (even subtlely) to
merit a separate forum? i'm good either way, just looking for
opinions.
Fragmentation is bad, let's keep all beagle talk on this mailinglist (it's not a forum).
I agree with Koen And Rullgård.
BTW,anybody can explain in detail about the new board.Specially about
hardware specification.
Production of the forthcoming new BeagleBoard design (referred to as
xM - extra memory and megaherz) is expected in June 2010. It is
reported to include the following:
* on-board USB hub with 10/100 Ethernet port and 4no. USB ports
* 1Ghz DM3730 SoC (nearly identical to and fully software
compatible with OMAP3630)
* 512MB DRAM
* microSD socket (push-push type, as used in some digital cameras etc.)
* on-board NAND flash removed
* expansion and LCD headers populated with connectors
* addition of camera port
* still no direct VGA connection possible
* serial connection via DB-9 connector rather than IDC header
* slight increase in board size, although mounting holes and
expansion header locations are to be maintained
It's expected to be exhibited at the Embedded Systems Conference in
Chicago (June 7-9). TI are understood to be offering "hands-on xM
classes" at their BeagleBoard workshop.
Whether there will be a subsequent price reduction in the current
rev.C4 boards remains to be seen.
No price reduction on Rev C4 boards. It actually cost more these days to build the Rev C4 board, not less as you seem to think. Prices have gone up on a lot of the components.
-Two new expansion headers, McBSP2 and MMC3, have been added as well
-Over voltage protection for those users that can’t seem to plug in the correct power supply
-Board will ship with a microSD card with a full desktop Linux version and associated documentation