Because we know that the BBB have problem with ethernet. But where did you try to correct the problem ? In the networking service ? Did you put a sleep ?
Where can I reduce the time of the execution of this service ?
Because we know that the BBB have problem with ethernet. But where did you try to correct the problem ? In the networking service ? Did you put a sleep ?
Where can I reduce the time of the execution of this service ?
micka,
Yes, 14 seconds is too long to spend on a service of this nature. Especially considering that here, I use a static IP, and it should spend 0 seconds waiting on the service.
As far as I can tell there is no way to change this. I spent a few hours googling around, and experimenting with a few things, and none worked . . .
I have the same problem, eth0 connected to a GbE switch, into our network, and eth0 set statically in /etc/network/interfaces. I even with your most recently released image changed out systemd for sysv, thinking that maybe it would make a little difference. But it changed nothing.
All those posts on Archlinux I’ve found were people had the same problem discussed a service file and a Settimeout
variable. But I could not found this variable in any of the networking.service files for systemd on this image . . . but also some discussed if this variable is set too low, it’ll cause the system to wait even longer . . . so yeah I do not know.
Anyway, I’d prefer not to use connman . . . but I would like this problem fixed. And this is a recent development. As in it’s a Jessie thing . . .
Somewhere along the line, someone decided that if you had any entries
in /etc/network/interfaces, that 'should' be up before the login
prompt appears..
I’ve put some log in the file /etc/init.d/networking . And this file work very quickly. Weird … Looks like that systemd takes time to detect that the service finished.
[ 11.213262] net eth0: initializing cpsw version 1.12 (0)
[ 11.215589] net eth0: phy found : id is : 0x7c0f1
[ 11.231729] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
[ 117.675769] cpsw 4a100000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up - 100Mbps/Full - flow control rx/tx
Any idea where I should start looking to resolve this problem ? I would not mind hunting the problem down myself, and then giving the group the information.